A Simplified connection of HEV AC/AC powertrain
Abstract
The paper deals with a simplified configuration of series HEV hybrid vehicles. Simplification consists of the downsizing of auxiliary 4QC converter needed for hybrid operational modes. Besides, operation in autonomous traction accu-battery modes uses direct 0x5 configuration of traction 3x5 McX matrix converter. Such a configuration can be derived from that main traction converter. Major advantages of simplified connection are beside smaller 4QC converter size – possible little bit better efficiency of the HEV powertrain. Chosen operational modes of modelling and simulation of traction powertrain configuration are focused on start-up and traction drive of HEV powered by ICE, start-up of ICE powered by AB accu-battery using SG as a starter, and traction drive powered by AB accu-battery and braking of traction motor moving energy into accu- battery AB. The results of all simulation experiments are given in the paper.
References
2. Dobrucky, B., Kascak, S., Prazenica, M., Drgona, P. Pavlasek, P.: AC/AC powertrain control under different HEV supply network. In: ELEKTRO 2018, 12th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, 21st-23rd May 2018, Mikulov, Czech Republic, pp. TBA, ISBN: TBA – accepted for publication.
3. B. Dobrucky, P. Zaskalicky, P. Pavlasek, “Control of Hybrid-and Electrical Vehicle with Five-Phase IM Motor,” Autobusy-Efficiency of Transport, 18(6), 1191-1195, 2017.
4. Ehsani M., Gao Y., Emadi A., Modern Electric, Hybrid- and Fuel Cell Vehicles, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2010.
5. F.A. Wyczalek, Hybrid electric vehicles, Proceedings of the Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC) 35th Intersociety, vol.1, pp. 349-355, July 24-28, 2000.
6. Hartani K., Bourahla M., Miloud Y., Sekour M., Electronic Differential with Direct Torque Fuzzy Control for Vehicle Propulsion System, Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci, Vol.17, No.1, 2009, © TUBITAK, doi:10.3906/elk-0801-1, no. 6, pp. 21 -38.
7. S. Bernet; S. Ponnaluri; R. Teichmann, “Design and loss comparison of matrix converters, and voltage-source converters for modern AC drives,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2002.
8. Rezaoui M.M., Kouzou A., Mahmoudi M.O., Nezli L., Com-parison Performances between Two Matrix Converters [3x3] and [3x5] Supplying a Multi-Phases Induction Machine, Journal of Electrical Engineering, www.jeee.ro.
9. Dobrucký B., Drgoňa P., Hanko B., Electric Servosystem for Turbocharger Vacuum Actuator Replacement, Autobusy, no. 6 (208), 2017, ISSN 1509-5878, pp. CD ROM.
10. Zhang B., Bai H., Pekarek S.D., Eversman W., Krefta R., Holbrook G., Buening D., Comparison of 3-, 5-, and 6-phase machines for automotive charging applications, In Proc. IEEE Int. Electric Machines and Drives Conf. IEMDC, Madison, WI, 2003, CD-ROM paper 10642.
11. Levi E., Jones M., Vukosavic S.N., Toliyat H.A., A novel concept of a multiphase, multi-motor vector controlled drive system supplied from a single voltage source inverter, IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 19, pp. 320-335, 2004.
12. Jones M., Levi E., Vukosavic S.N., Independent Control of Two Five-Phase Induction Machines Connected in Parallel to a Single Inverter Supply, 1-4244-0136-4/06/$20.00 '2006 IEEE, pp. 1257-1262.
Copyright (c) 2018 Autobusy – Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.